Posted by: faqir | December 26, 2009

On Ibn Rushd’s Affirmation of a Direction for Allah

This is a very weakly-grounded argument, because he claimed that direction [jiha] does not necessitate place, and that place dose not necessitate corporeality – and this is false. The inherent link between direction and place is clarified by the theologians’ definition of place, for they say that a hayyiz (boundary) is a place and that a place is a conceptual void (farāgh) occupied by an extended substance. As for direction, it is the relative connection of ‘where’ between two substances or two limited/bounded things; therefore it is an ascription. Thus it is not possible to imagine a thing in a direction that is not bounded/limited. This view is correct even according to the philosophers as we explained earlier.

Read More:

On Ibn Rushd’s Affirmation of Direction for Allah
Shaykh Sa’id b. Abd al-Latif Foudah

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Categories

Dar al-Hadith

Ahl al-Sunna wa al-Jama'a

Ibriz Media Φ

Ahl al-Sunna wa al-Jama'a

Sunni Answers

Challenging Heresy Head On!

Darul Tahqiq

Ahl al-Sunna wa al-Jama'a

Wahhabism Unveiled

BREAKING THE HORNS OF SATAN

%d bloggers like this: